Why do an interview with Russian Philosopher Irene Caesar?
Irene Caesar Russian Philosopher Artist Visionary
First of all, Irene Caesar has a very unique viewpoint about the current situation on the planet. And with the massmedia in the US and Europe more or less completely embedded in the war-mongering military-industrial complex of Washington and its allies I found it really interesting having the opportunity to lead this 2 1/2 hours interview with someone who sees humanity in total and specifically Russia from a very distinct perspective. And I guess with mankind on the brink of war it needs to check all available perspectives to find its own heritage and true potential! So in case you’re interested in listening to backgrounds about not only the current events in Ukraine, but also the history of this development, the role of Vladimir Putin, die Quantum Leap and the many deceptions that are run by the current elite to establish not only the NWO but to finally have a completely enslaved weak mixed race mankind with a Brain Computer Interface BCI, you’re in the right place!
How did Edward Snowden connect Irene Caesar and me, Alexander Gottwald?
Irene Caesar Facebook Title Pic Snowden NSA Fake
By the beginning of March 2014 I read an intelligent comment by a woman on a Facebook-post of one of my friends there. So I looked at her profile and the first thing I found, was this title pic you can see below, suggesting, Edward Snowden is a fake made by NSA themselves. As I had done an astrological analysis of Snowden last June already, I was sure, her perception is accurate, though most people in the truther scene seem to be deluded by those mainstream stories about the „hero“ Snowden, stepping forward to denounce formerly completely secret and unknown parts of the NSA and their politics of basically spying on everyone anytime…
So through Ed „The Godfather of Truth“ Snowden we finally became friends on Facebook and started to chat. As Irene has a very unique viewpoint on current events but also the history and possible future of mankind, I asked her, if she was interested in doing a Skype interview. What you will read and see and hear in this article, is the result of these first encounters in March 2014, which finally led to the interview on April 8, 2014.
Video – Wake up or perish – Part 1 of the interview with Irene Caesar
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRdDRsXulwE
Video – Wake up or perish – Part 2 of the interview with Irene Caesar
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCYC4sl54uQ
Hitler and Putin – what do they have in common?
Human Design Charts Putin Hitler
Hillary Clinton made a public comparison recently between Putin and Hitler. So I checked their Human Design Charts and was surprised to find a lot of similarities in quite important points. After she had given an in depth look at her view on Hitler and his role in history, I insisted on this topic though Irene at first tried to talk about some other stuff instead of answering my question about the role of Putin in this game. I guess, this is a crucial part of the interview as it might give us a hint on what’s going on in the world in terms of global strategy and plans for further wars.
What are the Khazars, Irene is talking about several times during the interview?
I guess, understanding the concept of the Khazars being behind the Zionist attempts to dominate the world is crucial to really get into debunking the hostile take-over of the original Jewish religion of the tribe of Juda who were worshippers of Seth by those slave-trading, drug-trading people called the Khazars, who are not semites and who are mostly half Turks and half Whites, according to the research and understanding of Irene Caesar.
This is one of several videos on YouTube that give an insight in another view not only on Israel but also on the real goals of Zionism.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3LNdivpPpU
Who are these people from Ukraine, Irene Caesar is mentioning during the interview?
Ihor Kolomoyski Zionist Oligarch from Ukraine
Irene Caesar is mentioning quite some names during the course of the interview, you might not have been familiar before. The forst one she mentions is Ihor Kolomoyskyi, the second richest man in Ukraine, an oligarch living in Switzerland. She claims that he has financed the Mossad coup d’etat in Ukraine which just got disguised as a fascist coup to deceive the public about the real backgound of what is going on.
Another name she mentions is Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who was born in Dnipropetrovsk where the biggest zionist center in the world is now being built. As this former Chabad-leader is regarded as kind of a messiah, Irene Caesar claims that Dnipropetrovsk for Zionists has become more important than Jerusalem and that his infamous speech about the destruction of Ukraine and Russia shows the roadmap for the upcoming NATO activities in the region.
Monopolar world vs. multipolar world
What Irene Caesar is talking about a lot is that the NWO and those who push it, mainly the decendants of Khazar slave and drug traders, want a monopolar world. She says that scientifically there is no such thing in the quantum universe as a monopol. Each any everyone of us is completely unique. The universe according to this understanding is and must be multipolar. So we need to understand that we have been enslaved on this planet and that we need to wake up and stand up for our own uniqueness, for the uniqueness of the land we live on and for the unique heritage of our people.
To avoid WW3 it is high time to wake up to who we truly are and start to live from that potential. We don’t need any rulers. We don’t need world government, enslavement and suppression of mankind. We have to claim our spiritual heritage as children of the universe and start living from that!
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc55U1S49Ws
Please feel free to comment on this article and share it whereever you feel like! Please use the social media buttons provided here to help spread the word! May we all wake up! May we all see the beauty of who we truly are! May we all learn to live together peacefully on this planet! Thank you!
All (IS) love,
Alexander Gottwald
Kommentare
Tagged with: BCI • Brain Computer Interface • drug trading • Hitler • Ihor Kolomoyskyi • Interview • Irene Caesar • Khazars • mixed race • NWO • Putin • Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson • Russian Philosopher • slave trading • Ukraine • Wake up or perish • WW3
Filed under: Interview • Irene Caesar • Video
The "quotations" that Irene Caesar "quotes" from "the Talmud" are fictitious. Someone pointed this out on another website, and I checked it out and found that it is indeed the case.
Apparently, there are lots of anti-Semites who spread these lies. I found that
http://rense.com/general86/talmd.htm
also does.
However, here is a website that has the actual Talmud:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Talmu…
If you will just google the "quotations" from those anti-Semites, you will always find that they are parroting each other's parroting of some original anti-Semitic fabrication.
Another thing that is instructive is to google the alleged cited sections of the alleged "Talmud."
For example, this has loads of fake "Talmud" "quotations":
http://irenecaesar.wordpress.com/2014/03/28/chaba…
The first "Talmud" "quotation" there is
"Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D"
but if you google even just "Simeon Haddarsen" you will find that all occurrences of it are from the anti-Semites, and there is no such section in the actual Talmud: no part of the Talmud has such a title.
So, either this is an anti-Semitic website, in which case they won't post this reader-comment (because truth means nothing to them), or else it's a website by someone who was taken in by vicious liars. Because what it's building upon is lies by liars.
Here is a website that takes them to task for that:
http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/van_hyning…
Dear Eric, first of all, I am not an anti-Semite. I strongly oppose any forms of fascism, racism and Nazism, especially by Talmudic Judaism and Hitler, who introduced Talmudic anti-values of genocide into our Russian-Aryan culture. Moreover, I organized a Club for Defending the Rights of Semites, especially, Palestinians and Syrians, and True Negroid Israelites against their genocide. Here is the disclaimer:
http://irenecaesar.wordpress.com/disclaimer/
I also suggest you see this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRtc0XaA5k0
This video clearly states that the maternal DNA of Ashkenazi (92% of all world Jews) is from white European (Russian) women, and their paternal DNA is from Turks and Kurds. This means that these “so-called Jews” are half-brothers of Russians. They are Turks from a white mother, and their motherland is Turkistan. Ashkenazi so-called Jews are Mongoloids, and NOT SEMITES! “Semite” means half-black-half-white. Ashkenazi so-called Jews are Goyim who pretend to be Jews! True Old Testament Jews were Negroes from the Tribe of Seth, which also calls itself the Tribe of Judah in the Land of Seth (Upper Egypt – Ethiopia and North Sudan. Ashkenazi so-called Jews have nothing to do both RACIALLY and HISTORICALLY with the true Negroid Jews of the Old Testament.
As regards the true Negroid Jews of the Old Testament, they were a very primitive tribe when they crossed the shallow Sea of Reeds into Sinai. They were so primitive that they did not even have their own written language. They used our Russian-Aryan Runes to create their written language Hebrew. All so-called Paleo-Hebrew is written with Russian-Aryan runes (identical to all runes of white races, i.e., Celtic Runes, Germanic Runes, Anglo-Saxon Runes, Sanskrit, and Russian Runes).
Here is my response to your criticism regarding the textual evidence of Talmudic anti-values of genocide, Racism, and Nazism. I strongly suggest that you refer to the research by Eduard Khodos, who is himself a Jew and the head of the Jewish community of Kharkov, Ukraine. He is the most famous in Russia critic of the Talmudic Judaism, which he calls “Jewish Fascism”.
The citations in my essay pertain to the wide variety of sources from the Talmudic Judaism. For example, Simeon Haddarsen (Simon Haddar) is the 10th century commentator of Talmud, himself of the Khazar origin. It is clear that the Khazar commentators of Talmud added some purely Mongoloid world-view into the Negroid Judaism, including purely Mongoloid traditions, which you would never find in the Old Testament. For example, they added the cutting off ears of the enemy, which is still practiced by the Muslim Khazars of Azerbaijan (these Khazars do not have the addition of the Russian-Aryan blood).
All the Medieval textual evidence from the Khazar’s commentary on Talmud is solidly confirmed by the present-day Khazar’s commentary on Talmud. Nonetheless, lobbyists and shills of the ultra-radical Nazi, fascist and racist Hasidic movement of Chabad-Lubavich are making effort of concealing the textual evidence from the Talmud and its commentators. But it is impossible to conceal this evidence, and to conceal the offshoot of Talmudic genocidal Nazism in the books of contemporary Chabad leaders, e.g., those by Yitzchak Ginsburgh, who said the following things: “Jewish blood is not the same as Arab [goyim] blood. He who is not a Jew, and throws stones, or threatens Jews, comes under the (biblical injunction) 'you should kill him first” (Ilana Kass, Bard E. O'Neill, The deadly embrace: the impact of Israeli and Palestinian rejectionism on the peace process, University Press of America, 1997, p. 100.)
Even he Israeli newspaper Haaretz has called Ginsburg "a well known radical on his views on Israel Arab public," noting his "prosecution in the past for incitement to Racism after having published a book insisting that there is no place for Arabs in the state of Israel." (Levinson, Chaim (29 July 2010). "Police detain second Rabbi in connection to book condoning murder". Haaretz. Retrieved 29 July 2010).
In 1989, Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg was quoted in the New York Times regarding his views on recent attacks against Palestinians and the rise of racism in Israel:
Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg had offered biblical justification for the view that the spilling of non-Jewish blood was a lesser offense than the spilling of Jewish blood. "Any trial based on the assumption that Jews and goyim are equal is a total travesty of justice", he said (Cowell, Alan, "An Israeli Mayor Under Scrutiny", New York Times, 6 July 1989).
In 1994, Ginsburgh received widespread criticism for his article "Baruch Hagever" (The title means "Blessed is the man," (from Jeremiah 17:7). A version of the article later appeared as a chapter in a book, also called "Baruch Hagever" (1995), edited anonymously by Michael ben Horin (Ehud Sprinzak, Brother against Brother, p. 259), in which he praised Baruch Goldstein who had massacred 29 Palestinian worshippers at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron. [Motti Inbari, Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple? (State University of New York Press, 2009), p. 132.] [Don Seeman, Violence, ethics, and divine honor in modern Jewish thought, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 73 (2005), 1015-1048].
Rabbi Ginsburgh wrote that it is possible to view Baruch Goldstein's act as following five Halachic principles, namely "sanctification of God's name", "saving life" (referring to testimonies that he had allegedly received regarding a planned Arab massacre of Jews [Kuntres Baruch Hagever. p. 11, footnote 3], "revenge", "eradication of the seed of Amalek" and "war"[Kuntres Baruch Hagever, Introduction, p. 3].
Motti Inbari commented on this:
In his writings, Ginzburg gives prominence to Halachic and kabbalistic approaches that emphasize the distinction between Jew and non-Jew (Gentile), imposing a clear separation and hierarchy in this respect. He claims that while the Jews are the Chosen People and were created in God's image, the Gentiles do not have this status…. Ginzburg stated that, on the theoretical level, if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully. From this point only a small further step is required to actively encourage and support the killing of non-Jews, as Ginzburg did in the case of Goldstein [Inbari, p. 134].
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzchak_Ginsburgh
Part 2
Eric, you refer to the freemason website to prove the falsity of the well-known genocidal citations of the Talmudic commentators:
http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/van_hyning…
For example, the freemasons of the above website try to explain away the following textual evidence of the genocidal essence of the Talmudic Judaism: "One of the basic doctrines of the Talmud is that all non-Talmudists rank as non-humans, that they are not like men, but beasts. (Kerithuth, 6b, p. 78)" The website claims: “This claim is based upon a particular dialogue in which reference is made specifically to heathens in a fashion comparable to that of many Christian preachers who today still thunder away with the doctrine that only those who accept Jesus Christ will be "saved." Obviously no sane person with a semblance of decency would condemn present-day Jews for the dialogue of some individual religious philosophers 1700 years ago.”
Eric, the difference between Talmudic Judaism and Christianity is the difference between the doctrine of the universal genocide and enslavement by the god’s chosen people of Negroid Israelites or Mongoloid Khazars, on one side, and the doctrine of the universal brotherhood of Christians, on the other side. I am very sorry you do not see this difference.
The Old Testament clearly states that the Covenant with G-d is made by and only by the Tribe of Seth. And The Tribe of Seth is the Negroid Tribe from the Upper Egypt. This is clearly a Racist and Nazi doctrine from the beginning. Christianity offers Covenant with God to everybody independently of race and national identity.
Secondly, the calls for the universal genocide by the Talmudic Judaism are not something that happened once 1700 years ago. Talmudic Judaism insistently reproduces its calls for the universal genocide, and genocidal racism and Nazism of Rabbi Ginsburgh is the late 20th century sample. And the genocidal racism and Nazism of Rabbi Schneerson is the mid 20th century sample. While the genocidal racism and Nazism of Ihor Kolomoyskyi is the 21st century sample. It is clear that the paradigm of the global depopulation of the so-called “Illuminati” (13 Khazar Bankers of the so-called “Council of Thirteen”) is precisely the call for the universal genocide by the Talmudic Judaism. And Ayn Rand described it well in her “Atlas Shrugged”.
Furthermore, the freemasons of the above website try to explain away the following textual evidence of the genocidal essence of the Talmudic Judaism A JEW WHO KILLS A CHRISTIAN COMMITS NO SIN, BUT OFFERS AN ACCEPTABLE SACRIFICE TO GOD. 'Even the best of the non-Jews should be killed.' (Abhodah Zarah, 26b Tosepoth)." The Freemason website says: “Abhodah Zarah, 26b, Tosepoth. Tosepoth is not a part of the Talmud. It is a collection of commentaries on the Talmud. In a passage alluded to by Van Hyning, Tosepoth quotes a Talmudic source as stating that the command of killing all Canaanites was applicable only during the war against them.”
Eric, I refer you to the previous citation: "One of the basic doctrines of the Talmud is that all non-Talmudists rank as non-humans, that they are not like men, but beasts” (Kerithuth, 6b, p. 78). If ALL GOYIM are non-humans, then, clearly, Talmudic so-called “Jews” would treat them like non-humans or beasts. Whether Talmudic so-called “Jews” would kill Goyim or enslave Goyim is not that important from their point of view.
Eric, Khazars were engaged in slave trade. They traded white slaves. Russians destroyed Khazaria in the 10th century. And, Eric, RUSSIANS WILL AGAIN DESTROY KHAZARIA IN UKRAINE.
Moreover, Eric…. We will destroy the Global Zion.
No global depopulation! No global slavery via brain chips!
GLOBAL ZION OR THE ONE-WOLRD KHAZARIA WILL BE DESTROYED!
So sorry free-Khazar-masons!
I just today happened upon your having replied. So I checked again, because this one seemed to me especially evil:
"A JEW WHO KILLS A CHRISTIAN COMMITS NO SIN, BUT OFFERS AN ACCEPTABLE SACRIFICE TO GOD. 'Even the best of the non-Jews should be killed.' (Abhodah Zarah, 26b Tosepoth)."Abhodah Zarah, 26b, Tosepoth. Tosepoth is not a part of the Talmud. It is a collection of commentaries on the Talmud. In a passage alluded to by Van Hyning, Tosepoth quotes a Talmudic source as stating that the command of killing all Canaanites was applicable only during the war against them.
That's at http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/van_hyning…
Do you have a response to it? You said:
Eric, I refer you to the previous citation: "One of the basic doctrines of the Talmud is that all non-Talmudists rank as non-humans, that they are not like men, but beasts” (Kerithuth, 6b, p. 78). If ALL GOYIM are non-humans, then, clearly, Talmudic so-called “Jews” would treat them like non-humans or beasts. Whether Talmudic so-called “Jews” would kill Goyim or enslave Goyim is not that important from their point of view.
But that's non-responsive. It's not relevant. The passage was alleged not to be in the Talmud. Your reply said that the Talmud has a lot of evil things. That's not relevant. This passage is all that is relevant here, and you are not responding to the allegation that that passage was fraudulently attributed to the Talmud.
If that passage was fraudulently attributed to the Talmud, then what other things that you attribute to the Talmud aren't in the Talmud?
Incidentally: I'm not Jewish nor particularly interested in Judaism, but I am against bigots regardless of what the target of their bigotry is. So: false accusations against any religion's Scripture disgust me, and the Talmud isn't even Jewish Scripture; only the Torah is. A person can therefore be a Jew and yet reject the Talmud. To accuse a Roman Catholic because some Catholic commentator on the Bible said some disgusting things would be bigoted just like to accuse a Jew because some Jewish commentator on the Torah said some disgusting things. All bigots are the same, in my book. The question here is: Are you citing as being in the Talmud things that aren't even in the Talmud?
I recently led another Interview with Russian Philosopher Irene Caesar, recorded in March 2015:
Teil 1: http://rutube.ru/video/9b70ca32e71480393a6f0cff6e…
Teil 2: http://rutube.ru/video/6c3e546a77e96310ffd6a01abc…
Good to see.
Whether one agrees with IC or not, she definitely provides info that one does not come across easily. At least she injects new concepts for one to examine. And I do not think that she is an anti Smt. Even when she were what is wrong with being anti something? I will be looking for her next video interview. Thanks AG.
GI